Journal Entry #1



Ben Goldacre: Battling Bad Science Response
Sadly, the issue addressed in the video by Dr. Goldacre about how people are making decisions in the absence of the information needed in the health industry, is unacceptable. Everyday we come across new data and research on the media that we believe to be true but fail to see its accuracy. Dr. Goldacre highlights that in science we need to know reasons in what we believe in, however surprisingly, even with the real data present we choose what information to let in our minds and what to leave out. For instance, recently the issues of health insurance or tax reforms in our country frustrates some, yet does not bother others. Those people who are not affected sit back and wait until another social issue erupts and affects them, directly or indirectly.
Perhaps, neglecting data or research in the science makes us biased and incapable of making decisions. Companies and agencies like the European Medicines need to be held accountable for withholding data and jeopardizing the lives of people. There should be a governmental agency responsible for collecting the concealed information and making it accessible to the public so the future generation could be benefited from. There should also be laws regulating the trials because we cannot afford having more than fifty percent (76%) trials withheld and let science become political. Journalists and scientists should also stop using the same old techniques because this is the era where medicine is funded by industries and majority of the evidence is not present.
If scientists and key players in the health industries do not act quick on the ways evidence is distorted, we will not be able to find solutions to health issues such as the cure to cancer. We must quickly acknowledge that politics and science are two distinct fields and if interchanged, consequences are to be faced.


Comments